[KPhotoAlbum] Search performance
tobias.leupold at gmx.de
Thu Oct 18 23:34:30 CEST 2018
> But I still think that the index.xml format has good properties (resistant
> against file corruption, easy/robust versioning, readable and writable "by
> hand"). Also, many people use kphotoalbum on different machines in different
> versions - with the XML format, you can easily pull that off as long as you
> take some care.
I must say that the XML database format was one reason for me to use KPA at
all back then. I thought I'll spend a lot of time with tagging and a lot of
energy will flow into this database. And if the KPA thing ends up sucking one
day, I will still have that database that I can even read "by hand" with a
normal text editor. And that's why I thought "no matter what happens, my data
is safe and mine after all".
I don't know if other users have/had the same thought. But I think this
"special" approach (I don't think it's really common for that task) to save
the data is a good thing.
Surely, one can optimize. A in-memory SQLite datase for fast search queries is
a nice idea for sure. But I would really stick to the XML file as the on-disk
Just my thoughts ...
More information about the KPhotoAlbum