[KPhotoAlbum] Search performance (at least) linear in number of search terms?
rlk at alum.mit.edu
Mon Jul 17 05:35:02 CEST 2017
On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 23:50:43 +0200, Johannes Zarl-Zierl wrote:
> On Sonntag, 16. Juli 2017 09:53:37 CEST Tobias Leupold wrote:
>> In case of doubt, Johannes is the one to decide whether or not, but I think
>> this can be removed in favor of using Qt directly. Which does not only â as
>> you stated â speed up the code, but also simplify it.
> I don't think there is any doubt here: you both mentioned two concrete advantages and no obvious disadvantages. Go for it...
It was messier than I expected because there were a lot of uses of
StringSet, which was defined in Set.h. I renamed Set.h to StringSet.h
and cleaned up the uses of Set.h (some of which were gratuitous).
I guess I could have done it the easy way and just removed Set.cpp and
everything but StringSet from Set.h, but I was a glutton for punishment.
Robert Krawitz <rlk at alum.mit.edu>
*** MIT Engineers A Proud Tradition http://mitathletics.com ***
Member of the League for Programming Freedom -- http://ProgFree.org
Project lead for Gutenprint -- http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net
"Linux doesn't dictate how I work, I dictate how Linux works."
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 14413 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the KPhotoAlbum