[KPhotoAlbum] Poll: Estimated parent/child count in your DB.
tero at tilus.net
Thu Nov 29 11:21:56 CET 2007
2007-11-29 10:54, Martin Höller:
> How should I use the master/child relationship here? Is the panorama
> the resulting master or a child? What if i want several version of
> the generated panorama?
>From what I was talking about (concept of masters and derivates) the
original exposures are masters and the stitched panorama is their
commond derivate, master --> derivate relationships go like
shot 1 --+
shot 2 --+
shot 3 --+--> panorama
shot 4 --+
shot 5 --+
> The image I want to see in thumbnail browser is definitively a
> panorama and not (one of) the original ones. The originals should be
> attached to it. So should the panorama be the "master"?
I think the concept of "hiding" should (at least implementation-wise)
be separated from the relationship. Binding them together would only
bring us unnecessary complications and limitations. I explained it
more thoroughly in my previous mail.
> On the other hand, if I have a picture which I want to improve using
> gimp or whatever, I would have one "master" with one (or probably
> several) derived "child/children".
> So I guess for my use a many-to-many relation whould be a must! Am I
> missing something here?
Again, exactly. If the concept we are trying to modell is
master-derivate relationship, we should (at least some day, if not in
the next release) have many-to-many relationship.
Tero Tilus ## 050 3635 235 ## http://www.tilus.net/koti/tero/
More information about the KPhotoAlbum