[KPhotoAlbum] KPA Survey

Lars Clausen lars at raeder.dk
Fri Jan 12 02:01:54 CET 2007


Tero Tilus said:
> 2007-01-11 08:29, Lars Clausen:
>> I think the multiple-versions-of-same-shot and related-shots
>> concepts should be kept separate to avoid confusion.
>
> I agree.  Even if they might actually have largely common
> implementation, the concepts are very much different.
>
> Talking about related-shots.  Am I the only one who can not think of
> any relation that is _not_ well representable with current tagging
> system and would be something else than definig "related" all pics
> closer to each other in time than given threshold, assume "related" be
> an equivalence relation and grouping together all equivalence classes.

I can think of one obvious case:  Panorama shots.  I will frequently do
carefully overlapping panorama shots from a tripod, with easily 10 seconds
between them, whereas not-as-closely related pictures from, say, a sports
event would have less time between them.  Current tagging is not very good
for this -- I'd have to create a new tag for each panorama collection of
shots.

-Lars


More information about the KPhotoAlbum mailing list