[KPhotoAlbum] Poll: Estimated parent/child count in your DB.

Baptiste MATHUS ml at batmat.net
Sat Dec 1 20:03:03 CET 2007

2007/11/29, Tero Tilus <tero at tilus.net>:
> 2007-11-29 09:20, Paul Fleischer:
> > But, of course you are correct that it would be more efficient to
> > have a map with less entries (namely parents).
> How about a little poll to verify assumptions?
> Hi all!  What would (in your DB) be the estimated
> a) percentage of "parents" (photos having "children") and
> b) average "child" count per "parent"?
> I'd say (just by lookin, not actually counting) that I'd have 1 parent
> per 50-200 photos (0.5-2%) and mostly 5-10 children per parent.

Woaw, you modifiy almost your photos :-).

I have a 13000 photos/videos db, and I think modified versions are less than
10 photos.
My cameras stores directly jpg, and I almost always simply extract the
photos and tag them.

So for me, using the parent/child feature would be rare. Understand me : I'm
not saying it's useless, even the contrary, in fact I think I could begin
modify more photos now I know I could link photos between themselves. But
for the moment, linking photos wouldn't be used a lot.

-- Baptiste

> Tero Tilus ## 050 3635 235 ## http://www.tilus.net/koti/tero/
> _______________________________________________
> KPhotoAlbum mailing list
> KPhotoAlbum at kdab.net
> http://mail.kdab.net/mailman/listinfo/kphotoalbum

Baptiste <Batmat> MATHUS
BMathus at Batmat point net - http://batmat.net
Si chacun de nous a une idée et que nous les partageons, nous
repartirons tous les deux avec deux idées... C'est ça le Libre.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /mailman/pipermail/kphotoalbum/attachments/20071201/cadabecf/attachment.html 

More information about the KPhotoAlbum mailing list